Some thinking during a funny/sunny riding-day with my city bike.
The “genetic” of Vacuum Tubes seen as electron-only emitting/modulating devices cannot produce complementar pairs as happens in the Solid State World where we find gears such as npn/pnp, nmos/pmos, jnfet/jpfet…
All of this can be a very limiting problem with BiVtubes when we need to “mimic” standard Solid State architectures. For example Solid State Audio Power Amplifiers are architecturally simmetric, balanced, transformerless.
To overcome this limitiation we can use the well note Darlington/Sziklai pairs
Mutatis/Mutantis we can build the followin DartlingtonBivTriode/SziklaiBivTriode pairs
Fo example a complementar output stage could like as this
the Szikai pair can act also as simple current sink and in this case the grid of the tube is biased to a constant voltage.
Ready to run into the wild?
45 Basics
12bh7 Basics
6SN7 Basics
Schematics
Part List
SWIII Simulations
Amplifier Simulation Deck (One Channel)
Maximum Rating Measures
power_6sn7_tube1: (v(p1_cross_up)-v(k1_cross_up))*i(rp1_cross_up)=0.354096 at 0
power_6sn7_tube2: (v(p2_cross_up)-v(k2_cross_up))*i(rp2_cross_up)=0.354095 at 0
power_6sn7_tube3: (v(vcross_coupled)-v(k1_cross_low))*i(rk1_cross_low)=1.0535 at 0
power_6sn7_tube4: (v(vcross_coupled)-v(k2_cross_low))*i(rk2_cross_low)=1.05351 at 0
power_12bh7_tube1: (v(p1_driver)-v(k1_driver))*i(rp1_driver)=-1.49176 at 0
power_12bh7_tube2: (v(p2_driver)-v(k2_driver))*i(rp2_driver)=-1.49176 at 0
power_45_tube2: (v(p2_45)-v(k2_45))*i(rk2_45)=-4.31046 at 0
power_45_tube1: (v(p1_45)-v(k1_45))*i(rk1_45)=4.31046 at 0
power_rsupply_driver: (v(vpp45)-v(vdriver))*i(rsupply_driver)=-0.324416 at 0
power_rsupply_cross_coupled: (v(vdriver)-v(vcross_coupled))*i(rsupply_cross_coupled)=-0.091649 at 0
power_rk1_cross_low: v(k1_cross_low)*i(rk1_cross_low)=0.0458239 at 0
power_rk2_cross_low: v(k2_cross_low)*i(rk2_cross_low)=0.0458249 at 0
power_rk2_cross_up: (v(k2_cross_up)-v(k2_cross_low))*i(rk2_cross_up)=0.0103597 at 0
power_rk1_cross_up: (v(k1_cross_up)-v(k1_cross_low))*i(rk1_cross_up)=0.0103601 at 0
power_rp1_cross_up: (v(vcross_coupled)-v(p1_cross_up))*i(rp1_cross_up)=0.343957 at 0
power_rp2_cross_up: (v(vcross_coupled)-v(p2_cross_up))*i(rp2_cross_up)=0.343942 at 0
power_rp1_driver: (v(vdriver)-v(p1_driver))*i(rp1_driver)=-0.916225 at 0
power_rp2_driver: (v(vdriver)-v(p2_driver))*i(rp2_driver)=-0.916225 at 0
cap_voltage1_cross: v(p1_cross_up)=122.803 at 0
cap_voltage2_cross: v(p2_cross_up)=122.806 at 0
cap_voltage1_driver: (v(p1_driver)-v(g1_45))=200.162 at 0
cap_voltage2_driver: (v(p2_driver)-v(g2_45))=200.162 at 0
FFT- Full Load
Total Harmonic Distortion
Fourier components of V(out)
DC component:0.111185
Harmonic Frequency Fourier Normalized Phase Normalized
Number [Hz] Component Component [degree] Phase [deg]
1 1.000e+03 7.804e+00 1.000e+00 0.08° 0.00°
2 2.000e+03 1.610e-01 2.063e-02 -89.29° -89.38°
3 3.000e+03 6.226e-02 7.979e-03 0.37° 0.29°
4 4.000e+03 3.965e-02 5.081e-03 -89.85° -89.93°
5 5.000e+03 5.461e-02 6.998e-03 178.06° 177.98°
6 6.000e+03 3.933e-02 5.040e-03 87.51° 87.43°
7 7.000e+03 2.809e-02 3.600e-03 -1.47° -1.55°
8 8.000e+03 2.173e-02 2.784e-03 -90.74° -90.83°
9 9.000e+03 1.497e-02 1.918e-03 176.66° 176.58°
Total Harmonic Distortion: 2.477949%
Full Waves – Sinusoidal input
Heater Power Supplies Deck
Simulation Results: Rampup Time
HV Power Supply Simulation Deck
Simulation Results: Rampup Time
Negative Bias Power Supply Deck
Simulation Results